![]() ![]() Aperture itself has been around since 2005 nearly a decade. Why? Why Photos 1 and not Aperture 4?īefore we can look to the future, let's look at the past. Call this interpretation, speculation, or clairvoyance - but here's how I'm reading into this. There are more questions than answers now than ever before, and I'll try to come up with all the right questions and all my best answers. So let's take a step back and figure out what this really means, because obviously photography is far from unimportant to Apple. In short, Aperture as we know it is dead. When Photos for OS X ships next year, users will be able to migrate their existing Aperture libraries to Photos for OS X.” - Apple, Inc. “With the introduction of the new Photos app and iCloud Photo Library, enabling you to safely store all of your photos in iCloud and access them from anywhere, there will be no new development of Aperture. ![]() On the surface, it doesn't seem like good news, but there's a lot more to this than a few lines of text. But I wanted to take some time to really think this through before shouting from the rooftops. My phone, twitter and Messages have been ringing off the hook since the announcement was publicly made. I received an official call from Apple PR this morning about the future of Aperture.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |